Dog ownership in the UK
It’s a very sad fact that many dogs end up in rescue because people didn’t fully realise the true commitment of what they were taking on. They might have done some “research”, but this can be vague and open to misinterpretation, and many of the demands that the text you read might warn you about are not always as easy to solve in real life as they seem on paper or on a screen.
I first wrote this article nearly ten years ago, based on my own experiences of reading books versus looking at the real live dogs I was living with. My first Weimaraner, Cindy, taught me that books can say a lot of things, but the dog knows far more about being a dog than any book will ever tell you.
Somehow my article got lost in a digital meltdown somewhere, but I feel compelled to redeliver my message because a new threat to our dogs’ welfare is growing. In 2026 there is now an increasing band of unregulated trainers offering quick‑fix solutions with e‑collars, grots and prong collars. These tools were around ten years ago, but social media has normalised their use in a way that would have horrified most people back then.
What used to be seen as extreme and cruel equipment is now being promoted as everyday training by people with no formal regulation, no oversight and no requirement to understand canine behaviour. This approach to dog “training” can cause immense damage. The physical risks are obvious, but the impact on a dog’s mental wellbeing is often even worse. Pain, fear and confusion don’t teach skills. They make dogs feel insecure, react unpredictably and potentially become much more inclined to bite or even attack out of panic, and so even more likely to be given up for rehoming or euthanised.
I love dogs. They don’t deserve any of this. I hope you do too, and that the advice here helps make sure that the dog you choose to bring into your home has a home for life, and that you take them on as your dog for life.
So, back to the beginning....
We don’t need to delve into the history too much, but until the middle of the 19th century many of the breeds we know today were still working dogs. Their value to humans was not in their cute appearance or how well they put up with the kids, but how well they did the tasks required of them. Some dogs were kept as companions, but only by the very wealthy.
As dog shows became more popular, breed standards were written and people started selecting dogs more for how their appearance matched these standards.Did you know that the Cairn Terrier, Scottish Terrier and West Highland White Terrier were once classed as one type? They were known as the Scotch Terrier, or sometimes the Short‑haired Skye Terrier, until breed fanciers began selecting for different coat colours and appearances. Spaniels followed a similar path. They were originally selected by weight for different tasks, and a springer and a cocker could easily come from the same litter until breed standards separated them.
Pedigree dog ownership really took off among everyday families in the 1950s and 60s as people found themselves with more time and money. Kennel Club registration was valued as a sign of quality. Unregistered dogs were cheaper, while mongrels and crossbreeds were often accidental and given away for free.
As fewer dogs were needed for work, some breed standards became exaggerated, and closed gene pools led to chronic health problems. This was highlighted in the 2008 documentary Pedigree Dogs Exposed. The fallout that arose from this television programme caused massive reputational damage to the Kennel Club and a breakdown in trust of pedigree dogs and the people who bred them.
As pedigree dogs fell out of favour, people turned to designer crossbreeds such as labradoodles and cockerpoos, believing they were healthier. The irony is that many of these crosses were bred by puppy farmers cashing in on the trend for “hypoallergenic” dogs, and the health problems in dogs didn’t magically disappear just because two breeds were mixed.
When lockdown hit in 2020, demand for dogs exploded. Ethical breeders stepped back because they didn’t want to be associated with puppy farmers who were suddenly raking it in. Councils tightened regulations on commercial breeding, which sounded good on paper but often squeezed out small responsible breeders while large‑scale operators carried on meeting demand.